Field-to-export platform

Keep every field decision inspectable.

Move from a multi-field workspace to inputs, zones, calculated rates, human review and an exercised export package.

Genuine Better Yield zone management view with five colour-coded fictional zones labelled A to E on Baltic Parcel A.
Genuine Better Yield zone view of fictional Baltic Parcel A: five colour-coded management zones over 40.7 ha, each with its P, K and pH class. Demonstration data, not agronomic advice. Eight irregular fields and 154.2 ha are visible; the list marks Baltic Parcel A as having five zones.Basemap data attribution, not a Better Yield partnership. © Mapbox © OpenStreetMap © Maxar

Start with evidence

Keep source context beside the field.

Bring the boundary and relevant agronomic records into one review path before calculating a variable-rate plan.

A seeder working an autumn field in the Czech Republic at low evening light.
Field-work context, Czech Republic. Atmosphere only, not a Better Yield customer or deployment.Photo by Tomas Hudolin on Unsplash
INPUT 01

Field boundaries

Select an irregular boundary from the fictional multi-field workspace and check its map context.

INPUT 02

Analysis values and units

Review the fictional source values and units used to classify each management zone.

INPUT 03

Crop and product inputs

Keep the fictional crop, nutrient and product assumptions visible to the reviewer.

Fictional multi-field demonstration

Fictional workspace

Several irregular fields are shown together in the genuine interface.

Field inspection

Inspect the field before the plan.

Select an irregular boundary from the fictional multi-field workspace and check its map context.

  • Start in the multi-field workspace. Select an irregular boundary and check its map context.
  • Several irregular fields are shown together in the genuine interface.
Genuine Better Yield field view with several fictional irregular boundaries and one selected field.
Fictional multi-field workspace in the genuine Better Yield interface. The selected 43.11 ha irregular field, five coloured zones, coverage summary and prescription path are visible together.Basemap data attribution, not a Better Yield partnership. © Mapbox © OpenStreetMap © Maxar

Five zones, visible rates

Review what changes across the field.

The same irregular field carries its fictional classes and calculated rates through the genuine interface.

01 / 04

Geometry

Check the field boundary and all five zone shapes against the map context.

Classification

Compare the visible class and fictional analysis values for each zone.

Calculated rates

Inspect the labelled zone rates and visible variation before export.

Human decision

A responsible person decides whether the reviewed plan is ready to export.

Genuine Better Yield zone view with five colour-coded fictional management zones and class labels.
Five fictional zones with visible labels. Colour is not the only identifier. Five map zones and five records show area, coverage and P, K and pH class badges.Basemap data attribution, not a Better Yield partnership. © Mapbox © OpenStreetMap © Maxar

Prescription to package

See what leaves the product.

ISOXML and Shapefile were generated from the same fictional variable-rate plan in the running product.

01 · VRA
Genuine Better Yield interface showing a fictional irregular field with labelled variable rates.
Genuine Better Yield interface with fictional demonstration data. No customer operation or agronomic outcome is shown. Five base rates, ten transition areas, labelled values, a 207 to 813 kg/ha legend and the rate table are visible.Basemap data attribution, not a Better Yield partnership. © Mapbox © OpenStreetMap © Maxar
02 · EXPORT
Genuine Better Yield export dialog showing ISOXML and Shapefile choices for a fictional variable-rate plan.
Genuine export chooser from the fictional plan. It proves two exercised generation paths, not terminal acceptance. The genuine chooser visibly presents Shapefile and ISOXML, transition handling, kg/ha and an explicit Export action.
01

ISOXML package

Generated from the reviewed fictional plan with TASKDATA.XML in the package.

02

Shapefile output

Generated from the same fictional plan with its related file components.

03

Compatibility check

Confirm the target terminal, implement, licence and configuration before field use.

Generation is verified locally. Compatibility with a specific terminal and implement combination is not universal.

Invitations and access

Give people the access their work requires.

The exercised product separates account roles from field and farm access. Human review remains a distinct responsibility.

Genuine Better Yield Team Members view showing a synthetic owner and one pending collaborator invitation.
A real invitation and role state in the fictional local workspace. Access permission is separate from agronomic review. One synthetic owner with full access and one real pending collaborator invitation are visible.
01

Demonstrated in the product

  • A pending invitation in the genuine Team interface.
  • Account roles: owner, admin and collaborator.
  • Field and farm access: viewer, operator, editor and manager.
  • Authorised invitation and access changes where exercised.
02

Keep the boundary clear

  • Access permission is not agronomic approval.
  • Human review takes place before export.
  • Deployment, data and integration requirements are scoped separately.
  • Support ownership and service terms are confirmed for each engagement.
Technical evaluation

FAQ

Questions at the point of use

How are boundaries, units, classes and values checked?

The genuine interface keeps them visible across the field, zone and rate views. The responsible person reviews the fictional example before export.

What if an import or export needs attention?

Do not treat the workflow as complete. Keep the source file and visible state, then bring the exact file and target system to a product evaluation.

Which roles can invite people or change access?

The product uses owner, admin and collaborator account roles plus viewer, operator, editor and manager field or farm access. Exact actions depend on the exercised authorisation path.

Does generating ISOXML or Shapefile guarantee acceptance?

No. File generation was exercised locally. Confirm the specific terminal, implement, licence and configuration before field use.

Technical evaluation

Test the platform against your real workflow.

Bring one field, source-file pattern, team structure or terminal combination to an enterprise and technical evaluation.